Skip to main content

Practice knowledge base

Management by Walking Around (MBWA)

A manager regularly steps into the team's work context to see real obstacles, ask questions, and support people without a formal agenda.

Organization Team management-by-walking-around
Documentation sections

What it is

MBWA stands for Management by Walking Around. The manager does not wait for a report or escalation but periodically talks with employees where they perform their tasks: in the office, on the production floor, in a service line, or online. The practice helps spot barriers sooner, acknowledge contributions, and build trust. It works less well if the manager uses the walk-arounds as covert control or substitutes them for regular one-on-ones.

When it helps

  • Employees rarely raise issues on their own until a task is already derailed.
  • The manager gets a picture of the work only through reports and does not see the team's daily obstacles.
  • People perceive the manager's attention only as an error check or a talk about KPIs.
  • Employee contributions go unnoticed because results pass through several approval layers.
  • The team is experiencing change, and it's important to hear questions, fears, and practical difficulties quickly.

How to start

  1. 1 Choose two or three regular windows in the calendar when the manager is available for short conversations with no agenda or evaluation.
  2. 2 Inform the team that the purpose of the walk-arounds is to understand obstacles and provide support, not to check busyness or find blame.
  3. 3 Ask each person one or two open-ended questions: what is currently hindering their work, where help is needed, what went well.
  4. 4 Record recurring obstacles and one small action by the manager for each important signal.
  5. 5 Follow up with employees briefly: what was heard, what has already been done, and what still needs a separate solution.

Expected effect

The team communicates obstacles more quickly, and the manager sees not only the final metrics but also the conditions in which people produce results. This helps remove blockers more precisely, recognize contributions, and reduce the distance between management and daily work.

Common pitfalls

  • Turning walk-arounds into an inspection: employees will start preparing 'correct' answers instead of having honest conversations.
  • Collecting signals without returning with actions: trust drops when questions don't lead to a visible response.
  • Talking only with the loudest or most accessible people and missing quieter parts of the team.
  • Using the practice instead of one-on-ones, goal-setting, and regular feedback.
  • Making promises on the spot without checking resources, authority, and the decision's impact on other teams.

Further reading

  • Book: Tom Peters, Robert Waterman, 'In Search of Excellence'
  • Book: Edgar Schein, 'Humble Leadership'
  • Research: Amy Edmondson, Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
  • Book: Kim Scott, 'Radical Candor'

FAQ

How much time does this practice take?

Start with short talks of 10–15 minutes a few times a week. What matters isn't the number of walk-arounds but the regularity and the follow-up actions on the obstacles heard.

Who should own this practice?

Typically, the team's direct manager initiates it. HR can help with question frameworks and risk observation, but trust is built through the manager's direct contact with people.

Can MBWA be applied in a remote team?

Yes, by replacing physical walk-arounds with short informal calls, participation in work channels, and open windows for questions. It's important not to turn this into covert activity monitoring.

What if employees don't speak openly?

First, ask simple questions about work obstacles, don't argue with the answers, and quickly close small requests. Trust emerges when people see a calm reaction and real actions.

How do I know if the practice is working?

Look for: early signals about blockers appearing, employees reaching out for support before a crisis more often, and the manager returning with clear decisions on the topics heard.